LogoLogo
  • TEC Handbook
  • Glossary
  • How to Purchase $TEC
  • Introducing the TEC
    • A Brief History
    • Mission, Vision and Values
    • The Cultural Build
  • Get Involved
    • Onboarding
    • Discord Roles
      • Admin
      • Gravitons
      • Stewards
      • Orientation Coordinators
      • Subject Matter Experts
      • Contributors
      • Praise Giver
      • Acknowledged CC
      • New Member
  • Learn More
    • Organizational Structure
    • Organizational Norms
    • Community Tools
    • Working Groups
      • Communications | T.E.A.M. DAO
      • Commons Swarm
      • Communitas
      • Gravity | Conflict management
      • Legal
      • Parameters
      • Stewards
      • Transparency | Mutual Accountability
      • Reward System
      • TEC Labs
      • 0mega
    • Roles 🌿
  • Governance Framework
    • Introduction
    • Advice Process
    • Voting Tools & Methods
      • Conviction Voting
      • Tao Voting
      • Snapshot
      • Tokenlog
    • 🏛️ Celeste
  • Budgeting & Reward System
    • ABC & The Common Pool
    • Working Group Budgets
    • TEC Multi-Sig Wallets
    • !Praise
    • SourceCred
    • Bounties
  • TEC Funding
    • Token Engineering Projects
    • Proposal Submissions
    • Transparency
  • TEC Collective Agreements
    • Introduction
    • Collective Agreements
      • Hatch DAO
      • Gravity
      • Advice Process
      • Forum Voting
      • Conviction Voting
      • Disputable Voting
      • SourceCred
      • Praise
      • Github
      • Forum
      • Discord
    • Content Ownership Agreement
    • Code of Conduct
  • FAQ's & Additional Resources
    • FAQ
      • The DAO
      • Organizational Structure
      • Organizational Practices
      • Budget and Reward System
      • Getting Involved
      • Legal
    • Hatch 101
      • Hatcher Outreach
      • The Trusted Seed
      • The Hatch
      • Hatch Tokens
      • Hatch Process
      • Hatch DAO boundaries
    • How-To Guides
      • Hatcher Guidebook and Checklist
  • Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Hatch Terms TL;DR
      • Full Hatch Terms
    • Terms and Conditions for Submitting & Challenging Proposals
    • Terms and Conditions for Submitting Proposals
  • Archive
    • Archived Content
      • Governance toolkit used in the TEC:
      • 👥Cultural Layer & Tools
        • Tools TL;DR
        • 🔆Working Groups
        • 👥Advice Process
        • 🕊️ Gravity Dispute Resolution Group
        • 📊Conviction Voting (Signaling)
        • 🙋Forum Polling
      • 💸Fund Allocation Layer & Tools
        • Tools TL;DR
        • ✨The Rewards System
          • Rules of Praise and Quantification
        • 🤖Discord Emoji Voting and Telegram Bots
        • 📈Conviction Voting (Funding)
      • 🤖Smart Contract Layer & Tools
        • Tools TL;DR
        • 🧮Configuration Dashboards
        • 🧮Tokenlog
        • 🌼Dandelion Voting
        • 🗳️Tao Voting
      • (Retired) Hatch Outreach
      • Dandelion Voting
      • Disputable Voting
      • Conviction Voting
      • Hatch Parameters
      • 🙌Praise & Impact Hours
      • Contribution Reward
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • 0mega's Goals
  • Succes vs. Failure
  • Roadmap
  • What is the deadline?
  • Working Style

Was this helpful?

  1. Learn More
  2. Working Groups

0mega

The Working Group 0mega started with a rather big question of: “How can we enable Token Engineering Ethos to emerge from such diverse backgrounds across the globe?”

PreviousTEC LabsNextRoles 🌿

Last updated 2 years ago

Was this helpful?

Here you can check the Working Group . It is a live document, as the working group evolves this document is updated to reflect these changes.

These are the emerging from this WG's work.

Steward

Sebnem is the Steward of this Working Group.

@Solsista on the TEC's

0mega's Goals

We want to explore Contextual Ethics in TE. As many worldviews coexist in token networks, we need to learn how to apply multiples modes of ethical reasoning. Our main goal is to capture emergent TE ethics and offer practice sessions, as well as a safe space for peers with ethical dilemmas. This way, we hope to nurture unity of TE knowledge.

Succes vs. Failure

Succes

  • We have managed to make TE Ethics accessible without truncating the complexity of the topic.

  • Both the librare and practice sessions are in demand and are being used.

Failure

  • We fail to close the value-action gap.

  • We keep cutting corners when talking about ethics

Roadmap

What is the deadline?

The initiative proposals should be no longer than 2-3 month iterations at which end a useful outcome is reached, e.g. first prototype of a living library, initial principles and practice sessions.

Working Style

“We focus on actions, not outcomes” For example: We focus on the act of collecting and curating with care. The outcome of creating a useful library will follow as a consequence. But at the same time, we are open for emergence. Maybe the outcome is something we cannot yet imagine, and way more valuable, useful than a library. And that may take, as long as it takes.

Minimal starting point for a knowledge hub - We are now using Notion for the prototype - The initiative is called TE .

We started our TE Ethics Participators Research with feedback from social scientists into the . - We devised a process that centers around collecting, researching , and conducting focus groups of max.5 participants around this topic. - Inform Epilogue: An Interface to Moral Philosophy for Token Engineers

Manifesto
Token Engineering Ethical Principles
Discord
Consilience Library
appropriate methodologies
topics of interest
TE book chapter