LogoLogo
  • TEC Handbook
  • Glossary
  • How to Purchase $TEC
  • Introducing the TEC
    • A Brief History
    • Mission, Vision and Values
    • The Cultural Build
  • Get Involved
    • Onboarding
    • Discord Roles
      • Admin
      • Gravitons
      • Stewards
      • Orientation Coordinators
      • Subject Matter Experts
      • Contributors
      • Praise Giver
      • Acknowledged CC
      • New Member
  • Learn More
    • Organizational Structure
    • Organizational Norms
    • Community Tools
    • Working Groups
      • Communications | T.E.A.M. DAO
      • Commons Swarm
      • Communitas
      • Gravity | Conflict management
      • Legal
      • Parameters
      • Stewards
      • Transparency | Mutual Accountability
      • Reward System
      • TEC Labs
      • 0mega
    • Roles 🌿
  • Governance Framework
    • Introduction
    • Advice Process
    • Voting Tools & Methods
      • Conviction Voting
      • Tao Voting
      • Snapshot
      • Tokenlog
    • 🏛️ Celeste
  • Budgeting & Reward System
    • ABC & The Common Pool
    • Working Group Budgets
    • TEC Multi-Sig Wallets
    • !Praise
    • SourceCred
    • Bounties
  • TEC Funding
    • Token Engineering Projects
    • Proposal Submissions
    • Transparency
  • TEC Collective Agreements
    • Introduction
    • Collective Agreements
      • Hatch DAO
      • Gravity
      • Advice Process
      • Forum Voting
      • Conviction Voting
      • Disputable Voting
      • SourceCred
      • Praise
      • Github
      • Forum
      • Discord
    • Content Ownership Agreement
    • Code of Conduct
  • FAQ's & Additional Resources
    • FAQ
      • The DAO
      • Organizational Structure
      • Organizational Practices
      • Budget and Reward System
      • Getting Involved
      • Legal
    • Hatch 101
      • Hatcher Outreach
      • The Trusted Seed
      • The Hatch
      • Hatch Tokens
      • Hatch Process
      • Hatch DAO boundaries
    • How-To Guides
      • Hatcher Guidebook and Checklist
  • Legal
    • Privacy Policy
    • Hatch Terms TL;DR
      • Full Hatch Terms
    • Terms and Conditions for Submitting & Challenging Proposals
    • Terms and Conditions for Submitting Proposals
  • Archive
    • Archived Content
      • Governance toolkit used in the TEC:
      • 👥Cultural Layer & Tools
        • Tools TL;DR
        • 🔆Working Groups
        • 👥Advice Process
        • 🕊️ Gravity Dispute Resolution Group
        • 📊Conviction Voting (Signaling)
        • 🙋Forum Polling
      • 💸Fund Allocation Layer & Tools
        • Tools TL;DR
        • ✨The Rewards System
          • Rules of Praise and Quantification
        • 🤖Discord Emoji Voting and Telegram Bots
        • 📈Conviction Voting (Funding)
      • 🤖Smart Contract Layer & Tools
        • Tools TL;DR
        • 🧮Configuration Dashboards
        • 🧮Tokenlog
        • 🌼Dandelion Voting
        • 🗳️Tao Voting
      • (Retired) Hatch Outreach
      • Dandelion Voting
      • Disputable Voting
      • Conviction Voting
      • Hatch Parameters
      • 🙌Praise & Impact Hours
      • Contribution Reward
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • About
  • Advice Process Main Actions

Was this helpful?

  1. TEC Collective Agreements
  2. Collective Agreements

Advice Process

Gathering perspective before executing a proposal

About

The Advice Process enriches decision making and is a great companion of Do-ocracy. Community members are encouraged to take initiative anytime a problem or opportunity is identified. Using the Advice Process is easy and consists of identifying who are the experts or the people who will be affected by what is being proposed, directly requesting their advice and incorporating their feedback where it's appropriate according to the proponents discernment.

Advice Process Main Actions

  • Request advice in the Advice Process Forum section

  • Request Advice during a working group call

  • Request Advice on Github issues

  • Tag experts and individuals that are or will be affected by the proposal

  • Add comments and replies to the posts

  • Add comments and suggestions to documents

  • Incorporate feedback based on your discernment if you are the proponent

  • Provide constructive feedback if you are an advisor

  • Once the Advice Process is completed, the proponent can move the proposal to a voting category in the forum if needed.

  • Community members can guide new members to the Advice Process.

Is this action or outcome required?

  • The Advice process is optional, but its use is recommended by the community.

  • We value people’s time and attention, be mindful when tagging individuals to give advice to a proposal.

  • The advice to a proposal should be respectful and based on constructive feedback rather than criticism.

Is this action or outcome discouraged?

  • Violating the general code of conduct

  • Criticizing a proposal based on personal differences and/or conflict.

PreviousGravityNextForum Voting

Last updated 4 years ago

Was this helpful?